CMK version: Raw Edition 2.3.0p29
OS version: Debian Stable
deleted
CMK version: Raw Edition 2.3.0p29
OS version: Debian Stable
deleted
The check plugin included in Checkmk 2.3 adds âmax_availâ and âbytes_usedâ for the total size and then uses âmax_availâ as free space, from which the used percentage is then calculated.
The check plugin in Checkmk 2.4 uses âstoredâ instead of âbytes_usedâ, which is more correct:
deleted. I have no hope checkmk will do anything with feedback here
Because the underlying function âdf.df_check_filesystem_singleâ has âsize_mbâ and âavail_mbâ as arguments and not percentage.
By using that function the team did not have to re-invent the wheel.
As an end user i rather have âthe teamâ not to invent checks with bogus data. False positives are killing for the trust in an monitoring system. As an end user, i donât care about underlying functions.
Without even a simple acknowledgment of this odd behavior, why would i even bother to give feedback to checkmk? Why would i ever bother testing a beta? Why would i ever bother to pay for this?
This topic was automatically closed 365 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed. Contact an admin if you think this should be re-opened.