Why is checkmk reporting a warning when the temp is below the warning level?
Mfg,
···
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.: +49 30 9406 2800
You could configure upper and lower levels in the rule. Could be that this is still on default levels?
Regards
Mike
···
From: checkmk-en [mailto:checkmk-en-bounces@lists.mathias-kettner.de]
On Behalf Of JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de
Sent: Freitag, 21. Juli 2017 12:16
To: James Harrison via checkmk-en
Subject: [Check_mk (english)] Can anyone explain why this happens?
Why is checkmk reporting a warning when the temp is below the warning level?
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.: +49 30 9406 2800
I already did that. That is why it is showing the 30/40c thresholds. I put those in there.
···
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.: +49 30 9406 2800
From: FRANK Michael michael.frank@faurecia.com
Date: Friday, 21. July 2017 at 12:24
To: “Jimenez, Juan Esteban” JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de, James Harrison via checkmk-en checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
Subject: RE: Can anyone explain why this happens?
You could configure upper and lower levels in the rule. Could be that this is still on default levels?
Regards
Mike
From: checkmk-en [mailto:checkmk-en-bounces@lists.mathias-kettner.de]
On Behalf Of JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de
Sent: Freitag, 21. Juli 2017 12:16
To: James Harrison via checkmk-en
Subject: [Check_mk (english)] Can anyone explain why this happens?
Why is checkmk reporting a warning when the temp is below the warning level?
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.: +49 30 9406 2800
This electronic transmission (and any attachments thereto) is intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). It may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you are not the
intended recipient of this message, you must delete it immediately and notify the sender. Any unauthorized use or disclosure of this message is strictly prohibited. Faurecia does not guarantee the integrity of this transmission and shall therefore never be
liable if the message is altered or falsified nor for any virus, interception or damage to your system.
Is this a custom check? If so can you show the script used to see if it clarifies anything?
···
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 1:38 PM, JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de wrote:
I already did that. That is why it is showing the 30/40c thresholds. I put those in there.
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.: +49 30 9406 2800
From: FRANK Michael michael.frank@faurecia.com
Date: Friday, 21. July 2017 at 12:24
To: “Jimenez, Juan Esteban” JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de, James Harrison via checkmk-en checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
Subject: RE: Can anyone explain why this happens?
You could configure upper and lower levels in the rule. Could be that this is still on default levels?
Regards
Mike
From: checkmk-en [mailto:checkmk-en-bounces@lists.mathias-kettner.de]
On Behalf Of JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de
Sent: Freitag, 21. Juli 2017 12:16
To: James Harrison via checkmk-en
Subject: [Check_mk (english)] Can anyone explain why this happens?
Why is checkmk reporting a warning when the temp is below the warning level?
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.: +49 30 9406 2800
This electronic transmission (and any attachments thereto) is intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). It may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you are not the
intended recipient of this message, you must delete it immediately and notify the sender. Any unauthorized use or disclosure of this message is strictly prohibited. Faurecia does not guarantee the integrity of this transmission and shall therefore never be
liable if the message is altered or falsified nor for any virus, interception or damage to your system.
checkmk-en mailing list
Not a custom check. I went to hosts, rulesets, then temperature, and changed the rule to set new values and a regex to apply only to these temp sensors.
···
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.: +49 30 9406 2800
From: Gregory Tsintaris aladou.web@gmail.com
Date: Friday, 21. July 2017 at 12:44
To: “Jimenez, Juan Esteban” JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de
Cc: FRANK Michael michael.frank@faurecia.com, James Harrison via checkmk-en checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
Subject: Re: [Check_mk (english)] Can anyone explain why this happens?
Is this a custom check? If so can you show the script used to see if it clarifies anything?
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 1:38 PM,
JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de wrote:
I already did that. That is why it is showing the 30/40c thresholds. I put those in there.
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.:
+49 30 9406 2800
**From:**FRANK Michael michael.frank@faurecia.com
Date: Friday, 21. July 2017 at 12:24
To: “Jimenez, Juan Esteban” JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de, James Harrison via checkmk-en checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
Subject: RE: Can anyone explain why this happens?
You could configure upper and lower levels in the rule. Could be that this is still on default levels?
Regards
Mike
From: checkmk-en [mailto:checkmk-en-bounces@lists.mathias-kettner.de]
On Behalf Of JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de
Sent: Freitag, 21. Juli 2017 12:16
To: James Harrison via checkmk-en
Subject: [Check_mk (english)] Can anyone explain why this happens?
Why is checkmk reporting a warning when the temp is below the warning level?
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.:
+49 30 9406 2800
This electronic transmission (and any attachments thereto) is intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). It may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you are
not the intended recipient of this message, you must delete it immediately and notify the sender. Any unauthorized use or disclosure of this message is strictly prohibited. Faurecia does not guarantee the integrity of this transmission and shall therefore
never be liable if the message is altered or falsified nor for any virus, interception or damage to your system.
checkmk-en mailing list
checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
http://lists.mathias-kettner.de/mailman/listinfo/checkmk-en
Ahh, sorry, my fault. Now I understand your issue.
Your Critical lower threshold is at -10°C and the current value is at -28°C. The state should be Critical instead of Warning.
What version of Check_MK are you using.
Is it a Raritan PDU? Or what check plugin is used?
Regards
Michael
···
From: JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de [mailto:JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de]
Sent: Freitag, 21. Juli 2017 12:39
To: FRANK Michael; James Harrison via checkmk-en
Subject: Re: Can anyone explain why this happens?
I already did that. That is why it is showing the 30/40c thresholds. I put those in there.
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.: +49 30 9406 2800
From: FRANK Michael michael.frank@faurecia.com
Date: Friday, 21. July 2017 at 12:24
To: “Jimenez, Juan Esteban” JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de, James Harrison via checkmk-en checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
Subject: RE: Can anyone explain why this happens?
You could configure upper and lower levels in the rule. Could be that this is still on default levels?
Regards
Mike
From: checkmk-en [mailto:checkmk-en-bounces@lists.mathias-kettner.de]
On Behalf Of JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de
Sent: Freitag, 21. Juli 2017 12:16
To: James Harrison via checkmk-en
Subject: [Check_mk (english)] Can anyone explain why this happens?
Why is checkmk reporting a warning when the temp is below the warning level?
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.: +49 30 9406 2800
This electronic transmission (and any attachments thereto) is intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). It may contain confidential or
legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you must delete it immediately and notify the sender. Any unauthorized use or disclosure of this message is strictly prohibited. Faurecia does not guarantee the integrity
of this transmission and shall therefore never be liable if the message is altered or falsified nor for any virus, interception or damage to your system.
No, no, the value is at 28.1C, positive, not negative. The state should be no warning at all. I am using 1.4.0p8. It’s a raritan PDU and it is reporting correct values. The problem
is in CheckMK.
···
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.: +49 30 9406 2800
From: FRANK Michael michael.frank@faurecia.com
Date: Friday, 21. July 2017 at 12:56
To: “Jimenez, Juan Esteban” JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de, James Harrison via checkmk-en checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
Subject: RE: Can anyone explain why this happens?
Ahh, sorry, my fault. Now I understand your issue.
Your Critical lower threshold is at -10°C and the current value is at -28°C. The state should be Critical instead of Warning.
What version of Check_MK are you using.
Is it a Raritan PDU? Or what check plugin is used?
Regards
Michael
From: JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de [mailto:JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de]
Sent: Freitag, 21. Juli 2017 12:39
To: FRANK Michael; James Harrison via checkmk-en
Subject: Re: Can anyone explain why this happens?
I already did that. That is why it is showing the 30/40c thresholds. I put those in there.
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.: +49 30 9406 2800
From: FRANK Michael michael.frank@faurecia.com
Date: Friday, 21. July 2017 at 12:24
To: “Jimenez, Juan Esteban” JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de, James Harrison via checkmk-en checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
Subject: RE: Can anyone explain why this happens?
You could configure upper and lower levels in the rule. Could be that this is still on default levels?
Regards
Mike
From: checkmk-en [mailto:checkmk-en-bounces@lists.mathias-kettner.de]
On Behalf Of JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de
Sent: Freitag, 21. Juli 2017 12:16
To: James Harrison via checkmk-en
Subject: [Check_mk (english)] Can anyone explain why this happens?
Why is checkmk reporting a warning when the temp is below the warning level?
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.: +49 30 9406 2800
This electronic transmission (and any attachments thereto) is intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). It may contain confidential or legally privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you must delete it immediately and notify the sender. Any unauthorized use or disclosure of this message is strictly prohibited. Faurecia does not guarantee the integrity of this transmission and shall
therefore never be liable if the message is altered or falsified nor for any virus, interception or damage to your system.
This electronic transmission (and any attachments thereto) is intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). It may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you are not the
intended recipient of this message, you must delete it immediately and notify the sender. Any unauthorized use or disclosure of this message is strictly prohibited. Faurecia does not guarantee the integrity of this transmission and shall therefore never be
liable if the message is altered or falsified nor for any virus, interception or damage to your system.
I believe the problem may be in the chsck script, maybe there is an ‘and’ where an ‘or’ should be…
···
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 1:16 PM, JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de wrote:
Why is checkmk reporting a warning when the temp is below the warning level?
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.: +49 30 9406 2800
checkmk-en mailing list
Where should I go look for this check script?
···
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.: +49 30 9406 2800
From: Gregory Tsintaris aladou.web@gmail.com
Date: Friday, 21. July 2017 at 13:40
To: “Jimenez, Juan Esteban” JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de
Cc: James Harrison via checkmk-en checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
Subject: Re: [Check_mk (english)] Can anyone explain why this happens?
I believe the problem may be in the chsck script, maybe there is an ‘and’ where an ‘or’ should be…
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 1:16 PM,
JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de wrote:
Why is checkmk reporting a warning when the temp is below the warning level?
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.:
+49 30 9406 2800
checkmk-en mailing list
checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
http://lists.mathias-kettner.de/mailman/listinfo/checkmk-en
See in the service details the Service check command
···
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 2:42 PM, JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de wrote:
Where should I go look for this check script?
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.: +49 30 9406 2800
From: Gregory Tsintaris aladou.web@gmail.com
Date: Friday, 21. July 2017 at 13:40
To: “Jimenez, Juan Esteban” JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de
Cc: James Harrison via checkmk-en checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
Subject: Re: [Check_mk (english)] Can anyone explain why this happens?
I believe the problem may be in the chsck script, maybe there is an ‘and’ where an ‘or’ should be…
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 1:16 PM,
JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de wrote:
Why is checkmk reporting a warning when the temp is below the warning level?
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.:
+49 30 9406 2800
checkmk-en mailing list
It says “check_mk-raritan_px2_sensors”
···
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.: +49 30 9406 2800
From: Gregory Tsintaris aladou.web@gmail.com
Date: Friday, 21. July 2017 at 13:45
To: “Jimenez, Juan Esteban” JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de
Cc: James Harrison via checkmk-en checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
Subject: Re: [Check_mk (english)] Can anyone explain why this happens?
See in the service details the Service check command
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 2:42 PM,
JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de wrote:
Where should I go look for this check script?
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.:
+49 30 9406 2800
**From:**Gregory Tsintaris aladou.web@gmail.com
Date: Friday, 21. July 2017 at 13:40
To: “Jimenez, Juan Esteban” JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de
Cc: James Harrison via checkmk-en checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
Subject: Re: [Check_mk (english)] Can anyone explain why this happens?
I believe the problem may be in the chsck script, maybe there is an ‘and’ where an ‘or’ should be…
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 1:16 PM,
JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de wrote:
Why is checkmk reporting a warning when the temp is below the warning level?
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.:
+49 30 9406 2800
checkmk-en mailing list
checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
http://lists.mathias-kettner.de/mailman/listinfo/checkmk-en
No worries, you led me directly to the answer. The upper and lower limits are not set in check_mk, they are hardcoded in the PDU.
In other words, not a bug. It’s a feature! Surprise! LOL! 
···
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.: +49 30 9406 2800
From: Gregory Tsintaris aladou.web@gmail.com
Date: Friday, 21. July 2017 at 14:00
To: “Jimenez, Juan Esteban” JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de
Subject: Re: [Check_mk (english)] Can anyone explain why this happens?
The check is in /opt/omd/versions/1.4.0p8.cre/share/check_mk/checks/raritan_px2_sensors but with these kinds of scripts I cannot help you… Sorry
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 2:51 PM,
JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de wrote:
It says “check_mk-raritan_px2_sensors”
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.:
+49 30 9406 2800
**From:**Gregory Tsintaris aladou.web@gmail.com
Date: Friday, 21. July 2017 at 13:45
To: “Jimenez, Juan Esteban” JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de
Cc: James Harrison via checkmk-en checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
Subject: Re: [Check_mk (english)] Can anyone explain why this happens?
See in the service details the Service check command
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 2:42 PM,
JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de wrote:
Where should I go look for this check script?
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.:
+49 30 9406 2800
**From:**Gregory Tsintaris aladou.web@gmail.com
Date: Friday, 21. July 2017 at 13:40
To: “Jimenez, Juan Esteban” JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de
Cc: James Harrison via checkmk-en checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
Subject: Re: [Check_mk (english)] Can anyone explain why this happens?
I believe the problem may be in the chsck script, maybe there is an ‘and’ where an ‘or’ should be…
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 1:16 PM,
JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de wrote:
Why is checkmk reporting a warning when the temp is below the warning level?
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.:
+49 30 9406 2800
checkmk-en mailing list
checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
http://lists.mathias-kettner.de/mailman/listinfo/checkmk-en
You could overwrite that behavior in the temperature rule and use check_mk thresholds from the rule instead.
···
From: checkmk-en [mailto:checkmk-en-bounces@lists.mathias-kettner.de]
On Behalf Of JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de
Sent: Freitag, 21. Juli 2017 14:06
To: Gregory Tsintaris; James Harrison via checkmk-en
Subject: Re: [Check_mk (english)] Can anyone explain why this happens?
No worries, you led me directly to the answer. The upper and lower limits are not set in check_mk, they are hardcoded in the PDU.
In other words, not a bug. It’s a feature! Surprise! LOL!
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.: +49 30 9406 2800
**From:**Gregory Tsintaris aladou.web@gmail.com
Date: Friday, 21. July 2017 at 14:00
To: “Jimenez, Juan Esteban” JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de
Subject: Re: [Check_mk (english)] Can anyone explain why this happens?
The check is in /opt/omd/versions/1.4.0p8.cre/share/check_mk/checks/ raritan_px2_sensors but with these kinds of scripts I cannot help
you… Sorry
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 2:51 PM,
JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de wrote:
It says “check_mk-raritan_px2_sensors”
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.:
+49 30 9406 2800
**From:**Gregory Tsintaris aladou.web@gmail.com
Date: Friday, 21. July 2017 at 13:45
To: “Jimenez, Juan Esteban” JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de
Cc: James Harrison via checkmk-en checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
Subject: Re: [Check_mk (english)] Can anyone explain why this happens?
See in the service details the Service check
command
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 2:42 PM,
JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de wrote:
Where should I go look for this check script?
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.:
+49 30 9406 2800
**From:**Gregory Tsintaris aladou.web@gmail.com
Date: Friday, 21. July 2017 at 13:40
To: “Jimenez, Juan Esteban” JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de
Cc: James Harrison via checkmk-en checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
Subject: Re: [Check_mk (english)] Can anyone explain why this happens?
I believe the problem may be in the chsck script, maybe there is an ‘and’ where an ‘or’ should be…
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 1:16 PM,
JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de wrote:
Why is checkmk reporting a warning when the temp is below the warning level?
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.:
+49 30 9406 2800
checkmk-en mailing list
checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
http://lists.mathias-kettner.de/mailman/listinfo/checkmk-en
…and… I just found out that PDU limits and other params are set by putting them into an excel spreadsheet, then in a usb stick that is plugged into the PDU.
The PDU then looks for its Mac address and programs itself on the basis of the info in the sheet. Which means that whomever told me the values are wrong did not remember that those values had been agreed already.
Allllrightythen! Moving right along to the next item on the checklist…
···
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.: +49 30 9406 2800
From: “Jimenez, Juan Esteban” JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de
Date: Friday, 21. July 2017 at 14:05
To: Gregory Tsintaris aladou.web@gmail.com, James Harrison via checkmk-en checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
Subject: Re: [Check_mk (english)] Can anyone explain why this happens?
No worries, you led me directly to the answer. The upper and lower limits are not set in check_mk, they are hardcoded in the PDU.
In other words, not a bug. It’s a feature! Surprise! LOL!
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.: +49 30 9406 2800
From: Gregory Tsintaris aladou.web@gmail.com
Date: Friday, 21. July 2017 at 14:00
To: “Jimenez, Juan Esteban” JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de
Subject: Re: [Check_mk (english)] Can anyone explain why this happens?
The check is in /opt/omd/versions/1.4.0p8.cre/share/check_mk/checks/raritan_px2_sensors but with these kinds of scripts I cannot help you… Sorry
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 2:51 PM,
JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de wrote:
It says “check_mk-raritan_px2_sensors”
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.:
+49 30 9406 2800
**From:**Gregory Tsintaris aladou.web@gmail.com
Date: Friday, 21. July 2017 at 13:45
To: “Jimenez, Juan Esteban” JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de
Cc: James Harrison via checkmk-en checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
Subject: Re: [Check_mk (english)] Can anyone explain why this happens?
See in the service details the Service check command
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 2:42 PM,
JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de wrote:
Where should I go look for this check script?
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.:
+49 30 9406 2800
**From:**Gregory Tsintaris aladou.web@gmail.com
Date: Friday, 21. July 2017 at 13:40
To: “Jimenez, Juan Esteban” JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de
Cc: James Harrison via checkmk-en checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
Subject: Re: [Check_mk (english)] Can anyone explain why this happens?
I believe the problem may be in the chsck script, maybe there is an ‘and’ where an ‘or’ should be…
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 1:16 PM,
JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de wrote:
Why is checkmk reporting a warning when the temp is below the warning level?
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.:
+49 30 9406 2800
checkmk-en mailing list
checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
http://lists.mathias-kettner.de/mailman/listinfo/checkmk-en
Glad you resolved it!
···
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 3:13 PM, JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de wrote:
…and… I just found out that PDU limits and other params are set by putting them into an excel spreadsheet, then in a usb stick that is plugged into the PDU.
The PDU then looks for its Mac address and programs itself on the basis of the info in the sheet. Which means that whomever told me the values are wrong did not remember that those values had been agreed already.
Allllrightythen! Moving right along to the next item on the checklist…
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.: +49 30 9406 2800
From: “Jimenez, Juan Esteban” JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de
Date: Friday, 21. July 2017 at 14:05
To: Gregory Tsintaris aladou.web@gmail.com, James Harrison via checkmk-en checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
Subject: Re: [Check_mk (english)] Can anyone explain why this happens?
No worries, you led me directly to the answer. The upper and lower limits are not set in check_mk, they are hardcoded in the PDU.
In other words, not a bug. It’s a feature! Surprise! LOL!
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.: +49 30 9406 2800
From: Gregory Tsintaris aladou.web@gmail.com
Date: Friday, 21. July 2017 at 14:00
To: “Jimenez, Juan Esteban” JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de
Subject: Re: [Check_mk (english)] Can anyone explain why this happens?
The check is in /opt/omd/versions/1.4.0p8.cre/share/check_mk/checks/raritan_px2_sensors but with these kinds of scripts I cannot help you… Sorry
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 2:51 PM,
JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de wrote:
It says “check_mk-raritan_px2_sensors”
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.:
+49 30 9406 2800
**From:**Gregory Tsintaris aladou.web@gmail.com
Date: Friday, 21. July 2017 at 13:45
To: “Jimenez, Juan Esteban” JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de
Cc: James Harrison via checkmk-en checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
Subject: Re: [Check_mk (english)] Can anyone explain why this happens?
See in the service details the Service check command
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 2:42 PM,
JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de wrote:
Where should I go look for this check script?
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.:
+49 30 9406 2800
**From:**Gregory Tsintaris aladou.web@gmail.com
Date: Friday, 21. July 2017 at 13:40
To: “Jimenez, Juan Esteban” JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de
Cc: James Harrison via checkmk-en checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
Subject: Re: [Check_mk (english)] Can anyone explain why this happens?
I believe the problem may be in the chsck script, maybe there is an ‘and’ where an ‘or’ should be…
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 1:16 PM,
JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de wrote:
Why is checkmk reporting a warning when the temp is below the warning level?
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.:
+49 30 9406 2800
checkmk-en mailing list
LOL sounds familiar
···
From: checkmk-en [mailto:checkmk-en-bounces@lists.mathias-kettner.de]
On Behalf Of JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de
Sent: Freitag, 21. Juli 2017 14:13
To: Gregory Tsintaris; James Harrison via checkmk-en
Subject: Re: [Check_mk (english)] Can anyone explain why this happens?
…and… I just found out that PDU limits and other params are set by putting them into an excel spreadsheet, then in a usb stick that is plugged into the PDU.
The PDU then looks for its Mac address and programs itself on the basis of the info in the sheet. Which means that whomever told me the values are wrong did not remember that those values had been agreed already.
Allllrightythen! Moving right along to the next item on the checklist…
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.: +49 30 9406 2800
From:“Jimenez, Juan Esteban” JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de
Date: Friday, 21. July 2017 at 14:05
To: Gregory Tsintaris aladou.web@gmail.com, James Harrison via checkmk-en checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
Subject: Re: [Check_mk (english)] Can anyone explain why this happens?
No worries, you led me directly to the answer. The upper and lower limits are not set in check_mk, they are hardcoded in the PDU.
In other words, not a bug. It’s a feature! Surprise! LOL!
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.: +49 30 9406 2800
**From:**Gregory Tsintaris aladou.web@gmail.com
Date: Friday, 21. July 2017 at 14:00
To: “Jimenez, Juan Esteban” JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de
Subject: Re: [Check_mk (english)] Can anyone explain why this happens?
The check is in /opt/omd/versions/1.4.0p8.cre/share/check_mk/checks/ raritan_px2_sensors but with these kinds of scripts I cannot help
you… Sorry
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 2:51 PM,
JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de wrote:
It says “check_mk-raritan_px2_sensors”
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.:
+49 30 9406 2800
**From:**Gregory Tsintaris aladou.web@gmail.com
Date: Friday, 21. July 2017 at 13:45
To: “Jimenez, Juan Esteban” JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de
Cc: James Harrison via checkmk-en checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
Subject: Re: [Check_mk (english)] Can anyone explain why this happens?
See in the service details the Service check
command
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 2:42 PM,
JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de wrote:
Where should I go look for this check script?
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.:
+49 30 9406 2800
**From:**Gregory Tsintaris aladou.web@gmail.com
Date: Friday, 21. July 2017 at 13:40
To: “Jimenez, Juan Esteban” JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de
Cc: James Harrison via checkmk-en checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
Subject: Re: [Check_mk (english)] Can anyone explain why this happens?
I believe the problem may be in the chsck script, maybe there is an ‘and’ where an ‘or’ should be…
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 1:16 PM,
JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de JuanEsteban.Jimenez@mdc-berlin.de wrote:
Why is checkmk reporting a warning when the temp is below the warning level?
Mfg,
Juan Jimenez
System Administrator, BIH HPC Cluster
MDC Berlin / IT-Dept.
Tel.:
+49 30 9406 2800
checkmk-en mailing list
checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
http://lists.mathias-kettner.de/mailman/listinfo/checkmk-en