We're using Check_MK as part of OMD, and getting some strange results with the NetApp monitors associated with Check_MK.
While this one looks right:
fs_/vol/impulse_vm_01/ WARNING - 88% used (1213.7G of 1382.4G),
(levels at 80.0/90.0%)
I *think* this is meant to represent the Snapshot reserve:
fs_/vol/impulse_vm_01/.. CRIT - 513% used (787.9G of 153.6G),
(levels at 80.0/90.0%)
But it's not labeled "snapshot" in any way, whereas other volumes do have some ".snapshot" listed as monitored.
But the biggie is that this view of the aggregate is way off:
fs_aggr0 CRIT - 142% used (1592.3G of 1120.3G),
(levels at 80.0/90.0%)
Given that it's a 13.09 TB aggregate that the NetApp reports as being 86% committed but only actually 42% used.
Thoughts?
Versions and other background:
This is check_mk version 1.1.9i8
NetApp Release 8.0.1 7-Mode: Wed Jan 5 17:23:51 PST 2011
We are using 64-bit aggregates
Hi John,
when using SNMP V1 or older Netapp Firmwares, only 32 Bit gauges
are used for the size. If you volumes are > 2TB, thinks begin to
wrap around.
Please try using bulkwalk_hosts and configure your files to use
bulkwalk (and thus SNMP V2C).
Mathias
···
Am 28.06.2011 02:36, schrieb John medway:
We're using Check_MK as part of OMD, and getting some strange results
with the NetApp monitors associated with Check_MK.
While this one looks right:
fs_/vol/impulse_vm_01/ WARNING - 88% used (1213.7G of 1382.4G),
(levels at 80.0/90.0%)
I *think* this is meant to represent the Snapshot reserve:
fs_/vol/impulse_vm_01/.. CRIT - 513% used (787.9G of 153.6G),
(levels at 80.0/90.0%)
But it's not labeled "snapshot" in any way, whereas other volumes do
have some ".snapshot" listed as monitored.
But the biggie is that this view of the aggregate is way off:
fs_aggr0 CRIT - 142% used (1592.3G of 1120.3G),
(levels at 80.0/90.0%)
Given that it's a 13.09 TB aggregate that the NetApp reports as being
86% committed but only actually 42% used.
Thoughts?
Versions and other background:
This is check_mk version 1.1.9i8
NetApp Release 8.0.1 7-Mode: Wed Jan 5 17:23:51 PST 2011
We are using 64-bit aggregates
_______________________________________________
checkmk-en mailing list
checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
http://lists.mathias-kettner.de/mailman/listinfo/checkmk-en