Without the snmp output it is not easy to say what’s wrong.
Second thing what i can say from many windows hosts inside my monitoring environments is that snmp is not reliable on windows for monitoring things especially cpu and memory is not usable at all.
···
k19840@126.com k19840@126.com schrieb am Mo., 25. Mai 2015 um 12:00 Uhr:
Hi,
some of our windows servers can only get cpu data with check_mk, but with whatsup/snmp test tool, they can get all snmp datas (cpu/memory/disk etc).
and run snmpwalk it gets memory data back, but WATO only got cpu data. (tried “full scan” and diagnostic), no rule on the host.
the omd version is 1.20, os is centos 6.5 x64.
is there anything we can do?
thanks and have nice day.
Ken
checkmk-en mailing list
checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
http://lists.mathias-kettner.de/mailman/listinfo/checkmk-en
We’ll meet in Munich for the 2nd Check_MK Conference!
Book your place now and be part of it.
October 18th-20th, 2015
http://mathias-kettner.de/conference
k11
(k)
May 27, 2015, 1:54am
3
Hi Andreas,
full snmpwalk log is too large, some output as below:
SNMPv2-MIB::sysDescr.0 = STRING: Hardware: Intel64 Family 6 Model 23 Stepping 6 AT/AT COMPATIBLE - Software: Windows Version 6.1 (Build 7601 Multiprocessor Free)
SNMPv2-MIB::sysObjectID.0 = OID: SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.311.1.1.3.1.2
DISMAN-EVENT-MIB::sysUpTimeInstance = Timeticks: (694610235) 80 days, 9:28:22.35
SNMPv2-MIB::sysContact.0 = STRING:
SNMPv2-MIB::sysName.0 = STRING: wsp1.t.net
SNMPv2-MIB::sysLocation.0 = STRING:
SNMPv2-MIB::sysServices.0 = INTEGER: 76
IF-MIB::ifNumber.0 = INTEGER: 21
IF-MIB::ifIndex.1 = INTEGER: 1
IF-MIB::ifIndex.2 = INTEGER: 2
IF-MIB::ifIndex.3 = INTEGER: 3
IF-MIB::ifIndex.4 = INTEGER: 4
IF-MIB::ifIndex.5 = INTEGER: 5
IF-MIB::ifIndex.6 = INTEGER: 6
IF-MIB::ifIndex.7 = INTEGER: 7
IF-MIB::ifIndex.8 = INTEGER: 8
IF-MIB::ifIndex.9 = INTEGER: 9
IF-MIB::ifIndex.10 = INTEGER: 10
IF-MIB::ifIndex.11 = INTEGER: 11
IF-MIB::ifIndex.12 = INTEGER: 12
IF-MIB::ifIndex.13 = INTEGER: 13
IF-MIB::ifIndex.14 = INTEGER: 14
IF-MIB::ifIndex.15 = INTEGER: 15
IF-MIB::ifIndex.16 = INTEGER: 16
IF-MIB::ifIndex.17 = INTEGER: 17
IF-MIB::ifIndex.18 = INTEGER: 18
IF-MIB::ifIndex.19 = INTEGER: 19
IF-MIB::ifIndex.20 = INTEGER: 20
IF-MIB::ifIndex.21 = INTEGER: 21
IF-MIB::ifDescr.1 = STRING: Software Loopback Interface 1
IF-MIB::ifDescr.2 = STRING: WAN Miniport (SSTP)
IF-MIB::ifDescr.3 = STRING: WAN Miniport (L2TP)
IF-MIB::ifDescr.4 = STRING: WAN Miniport (PPTP)
IF-MIB::ifDescr.5 = STRING: WAN Miniport (PPPOE)
IF-MIB::ifDescr.6 = STRING: WAN Miniport (IPv6)
IF-MIB::ifDescr.7 = STRING: WAN Miniport (Network Monitor)
IF-MIB::ifDescr.8 = STRING: WAN Miniport (IP)
IF-MIB::ifDescr.9 = STRING: RAS Async Adapter
IF-MIB::ifDescr.10 = STRING: WAN Miniport (IKEv2)
IF-MIB::ifDescr.11 = STRING: HP NC110T PCIe Gigabit Server Adapter
IF-MIB::ifDescr.12 = STRING: HP NC373i Multifunction Gigabit Server Adapter #43
IF-MIB::ifDescr.13 = STRING: HP NC373i Multifunction Gigabit Server Adapter #48
IF-MIB::ifDescr.14 = STRING: HP Network Team #1
IF-MIB::ifDescr.15 = STRING: HP NC110T PCIe Gigabit Server Adapter-QoS Packet Scheduler-0000
IF-MIB::ifDescr.16 = STRING: HP NC110T PCIe Gigabit Server Adapter-WFP LightWeight Filter-0000
IF-MIB::ifDescr.17 = STRING: HP Network Team #1-QoS Packet Scheduler-0000
IF-MIB::ifDescr.18 = STRING: HP Network Team #1-WFP LightWeight Filter-0000
IF-MIB::ifDescr.19 = STRING: WAN Miniport (IP)-QoS Packet Scheduler-0000
IF-MIB::ifDescr.20 = STRING: WAN Miniport (Network Monitor)-QoS Packet Scheduler-0000
IF-MIB::ifDescr.21 = STRING: WAN Miniport (IPv6)-QoS Packet Scheduler-0000
IF-MIB::ifType.1 = INTEGER: softwareLoopback(24)
<…others droped…>
Thanks.
···
Ken
From: Andreas Döhler
Date: 2015-05-25 18:25
To: k19840@126.com ; checkmk-en
Subject: Re: [Check_mk (english)] data missing in SNMP
Without the snmp output it is not easy to say what’s wrong.
Second thing what i can say from many windows hosts inside my monitoring environments is that snmp is not reliable on windows for monitoring things especially cpu and memory is not usable at all.
k19840@126.com k19840@126.com schrieb am Mo., 25. Mai 2015 um 12:00 Uhr:
Hi,
some of our windows servers can only get cpu data with check_mk, but with whatsup/snmp test tool, they can get all snmp datas (cpu/memory/disk etc).
and run snmpwalk it gets memory data back, but WATO only got cpu data. (tried “full scan” and diagnostic), no rule on the host.
the omd version is 1.20, os is centos 6.5 x64.
is there anything we can do?
thanks and have nice day.
Ken
checkmk-en mailing list
checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
http://lists.mathias-kettner.de/mailman/listinfo/checkmk-en
We’ll meet in Munich for the 2nd Check_MK Conference!
Book your place now and be part of it.
October 18th-20th, 2015
http://mathias-kettner.de/conference