Hi
My workteam is upgrading from 1.5.0p16 CRE to 1.6.0p6 CEE. The problem is that some local checks running fine in 1.5.0p16 CRE are reported as “Invalid performance data” in 1.6.0.p6.
The error message is
UNKN - Invalid performance data: u’used=28741568;;;;50331648’. Output is: OK
It appears that the string “used=28741568;;;;50331648” is not recognized by the core of the 1.6.0p6 CEE as a valid performance value.
But this string follows the official format as described in
https://checkmk.com/cms_localchecks.html#perfdata
Other local checks not having the colons in their performance data does not report this issue.
I think it is a bug. What do you think?
Best regards
Extending an agent is simple | checkmk
- Why own checks? Checkmk already monitors many types of relevant data using a large number of its own standard check plug-ins. Nevertheless, every IT environment is unique, so that often very specialised requirements can arise.
checkmk.com
Hi José,
i think i know what the problem is.
Your performance data has only a critical value. Try to output the same value as warning then it should work.
I don’t know why it needs now a warn and crit value but it is working with booth values at my system.
Best regards
Andreas
PS: new location for all CheckMK questions and requests - https://forum.checkmk.com
···
Am Mo., 2. Dez. 2019 um 20:41 Uhr schrieb José Damián jdbenavent@hotmail.com:
Hi
My workteam is upgrading from 1.5.0p16 CRE to 1.6.0p6 CEE. The problem is that some local checks running fine in 1.5.0p16 CRE are reported as “Invalid performance data” in 1.6.0.p6.
The error message is
UNKN - Invalid performance data: u’used=28741568;;;;50331648’. Output is: OK
It appears that the string “used=28741568;;;;50331648” is not recognized by the core of the 1.6.0p6 CEE as a valid performance value.
But this string follows the official format as described in
https://checkmk.com/cms_localchecks.html#perfdata
Other local checks not having the colons in their performance data does not report this issue.
I think it is a bug. What do you think?
Best regards
Extending an agent is simple | checkmk
- Why own checks? Checkmk already monitors many types of relevant data using a large number of its own standard check plug-ins. Nevertheless, every IT environment is unique, so that often very specialised requirements can arise.
checkmk.com
checkmk-en mailing list
checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
Manage your subscription or unsubscribe
https://lists.mathias-kettner.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/checkmk-en
Sorry wrong answer 
Your check has only a maximum value and if you give an maximum value then CheckMK now also needs a minimum.
I don’t know why. With warning and critical it is easier. CheckMK will use the same value for warn if only crit is defined.
Sorry and best regards
Andreas
···
Am Mo., 2. Dez. 2019 um 20:41 Uhr schrieb José Damián jdbenavent@hotmail.com:
Hi
My workteam is upgrading from 1.5.0p16 CRE to 1.6.0p6 CEE. The problem is that some local checks running fine in 1.5.0p16 CRE are reported as “Invalid performance data” in 1.6.0.p6.
The error message is
UNKN - Invalid performance data: u’used=28741568;;;;50331648’. Output is: OK
It appears that the string “used=28741568;;;;50331648” is not recognized by the core of the 1.6.0p6 CEE as a valid performance value.
But this string follows the official format as described in
https://checkmk.com/cms_localchecks.html#perfdata
Other local checks not having the colons in their performance data does not report this issue.
I think it is a bug. What do you think?
Best regards
Extending an agent is simple | checkmk
- Why own checks? Checkmk already monitors many types of relevant data using a large number of its own standard check plug-ins. Nevertheless, every IT environment is unique, so that often very specialised requirements can arise.
checkmk.com
checkmk-en mailing list
checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
Manage your subscription or unsubscribe
https://lists.mathias-kettner.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/checkmk-en