I’m using check_mk to monitor (among others) HP ProCurve switches, via 'check_mk -I snmp '.
I have the strange phenomenon that some ports go on WARNING with the message…
WARN - (up) 100000000 (wrong speed!),
Question 1: “100000000” is of course the same as 100 Mbit, which is the correct link speed on these ports. Why would some ports (on the switch) be reported as 100Mbit and others as 100000000?
Question 2: Can I selectively choose on which ports the connection speed is monitored at all? The same applies for link status on certain ports.
I'm using check_mk to monitor (among others) HP ProCurve switches, via
'check_mk -I snmp <device>'.
I have the strange phenomenon that some ports go on WARNING with the
message...
WARN - (up) 100000000 (wrong speed!),
Could you try this with version 1.1.10b2? This should be fixed in
the current version.
Question 1: "100000000" is of course the same as 100 Mbit, which is the
correct link speed on these ports. Why would some ports (on the switch)
be reported as 100Mbit and others as 100000000?
Question 2: Can I selectively choose on which ports the connection speed
is monitored at all? The same applies for link status on certain ports.
Yes. If you use the current version. Please refer to the current man page.
--
__ __ _ __
Mathias Kettner | \/ | |/ / M A T H I A S K E T T N E R
Preysingstr. 74 | |\/| | ' /
81667 München | | | | . \ Linux Beratung & Schulung
089 / 18 90 42 10 |_| |_|_|\_\ http://mathias-kettner.de
Thankyou this seems to have done away with the “100000000” issue.
But Nagios still says that certain ports change their connection speeds, for example it goes critical because the connection speed is 10 MBit all of a sudden, but then after a few minutes it’s back to 1 Gbit.
I am relatively certain that no-one is swapping clients every few minutes.
If the speed toggles then the error is almost at 100% *not* with Check_MK. Might be a autoneg problem. That's the reason why we provide
such a check in the first place. Please try turning autoneg off
···
Am 09.03.2011 12:02, schrieb Marcel:
Thankyou this seems to have done away with the "100000000" issue.
But Nagios still says that certain ports change their connection speeds,
for example it goes critical because the connection speed is 10 MBit all
of a sudden, but then after a few minutes it's back to 1 Gbit.
I am relatively certain that no-one is swapping clients every few minutes.
On 8 March 2011 16:29, Mathias Kettner <mk@mathias-kettner.de > <mailto:mk@mathias-kettner.de>> wrote:
Am 08.03.2011 15:49, schrieb Marcel:
Hello all,
I'm using check_mk to monitor (among others) HP ProCurve
switches, via
'check_mk -I snmp <device>'.
I have the strange phenomenon that some ports go on WARNING with the
message...
WARN - (up) 100000000 (wrong speed!),
Could you try this with version 1.1.10b2? This should be fixed in
the current version.
Question 1: "100000000" is of course the same as 100 Mbit, which
is the
correct link speed on these ports. Why would some ports (on the
switch)
be reported as 100Mbit and others as 100000000?
Question 2: Can I selectively choose on which ports the
connection speed
is monitored at all? The same applies for link status on certain
ports.
Yes. If you use the current version. Please refer to the current man
page.
--
__ __ _ __
Mathias Kettner | \/ | |/ / M A T H I A S K E T T N E R
Preysingstr. 74 | |\/| | ' /
81667 München | | | | . \ Linux Beratung & Schulung
089 / 18 90 42 10 |_| |_|_|\_\ http://mathias-kettner.de
_______________________________________________
checkmk-en mailing list
checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
<mailto:checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de> http://lists.mathias-kettner.de/mailman/listinfo/checkmk-en
Am 08.03.2011 15:49, schrieb Marcel:
Hello all,
I'm using check_mk to monitor (among others) HP ProCurve
switches, via
'check_mk -I snmp <device>'.
I have the strange phenomenon that some ports go on WARNING with the
message...
WARN - (up) 100000000 (wrong speed!),
Could you try this with version 1.1.10b2? This should be fixed in
the current version.
Question 1: "100000000" is of course the same as 100 Mbit, which
is the
correct link speed on these ports. Why would some ports (on the
switch)
be reported as 100Mbit and others as 100000000?
Question 2: Can I selectively choose on which ports the
connection speed
is monitored at all? The same applies for link status on certain
ports.
Yes. If you use the current version. Please refer to the current man
page.
Thank you in advance.
Marcel
_______________________________________________
checkmk-en mailing list
checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
[http://lists.mathias-kettner.de/mailman/listinfo/checkmk-en](http://lists.mathias-kettner.de/mailman/listinfo/checkmk-en)
--
__ __ _ __
Mathias Kettner | \/ | |/ / M A T H I A S K E T T N E R
Preysingstr. 74 | |\/| | ' /
81667 München | | | | . \ Linux Beratung & Schulung
089 / 18 90 42 10 |_| |_|_|\_\ [http://mathias-kettner.de](http://mathias-kettner.de)
_______________________________________________
checkmk-en mailing list
checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
OK so today I decide to upgrade to check_mk 1.1.10 I followed the directions and made backups.
The only issue I have is the disk warning errors, see below
CRIT - 335.7% used (1718.71 of 512.0 GB), (levels at 90.0/95.0%), trend: +2.03GB / 24 hours
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information in this e-mail message, and any attachment, is intended for the sole use of the individual and entity to whom it is addressed. This information may be privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of it, or its, contents, is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in error please e-mail the sender and destroy all copies of this communication and any attachments. Thank you.
···
#####################################################################################
This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared
by MailMarshal
#####################################################################################
Looks like 32-Bit overflow on Netapp with df_netapp32 and Filesystems
···
2TB.
Am 09.03.2011 18:34, schrieb Emery, Ralph:
OK so today I decide to upgrade to check_mk 1.1.10 I followed the directions and made backups.
The only issue I have is the disk warning errors, see below
CRIT - 335.7% used (1718.71 of 512.0 GB), (levels at 90.0/95.0%), trend: +2.03GB / 24 hours
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information in this e-mail message, and any attachment, is intended for the sole use of the individual and entity to whom it is addressed. This information may be privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of it, or its, contents, is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in error please e-mail the sender and destroy all copies of this communication and any attachments. Thank you.
#####################################################################################
This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared
by MailMarshal
#####################################################################################
--
__ __ _ __
Mathias Kettner | \/ | |/ / M A T H I A S K E T T N E R
Preysingstr. 74 | |\/| | ' /
81667 München | | | | . \ Linux Beratung & Schulung
089 / 18 90 42 10 |_| |_|_|\_\ http://mathias-kettner.de
Am 08.03.2011 15:49, schrieb Marcel:
Hello all,
I'm using check_mk to monitor (among others) HP ProCurve
switches, via
'check_mk -I snmp <device>'.
I have the strange phenomenon that some ports go on WARNING with the
message...
WARN - (up) 100000000 (wrong speed!),
Could you try this with version 1.1.10b2? This should be fixed in
the current version.
Question 1: "100000000" is of course the same as 100 Mbit, which
is the
correct link speed on these ports. Why would some ports (on the
switch)
be reported as 100Mbit and others as 100000000?
Question 2: Can I selectively choose on which ports the
connection speed
is monitored at all? The same applies for link status on certain
ports.
Yes. If you use the current version. Please refer to the current man
page.
Thank you in advance.
Marcel
_______________________________________________
checkmk-en mailing list
checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de
[http://lists.mathias-kettner.de/mailman/listinfo/checkmk-en](http://lists.mathias-kettner.de/mailman/listinfo/checkmk-en)
--
__ __ _ __
Mathias Kettner | \/ | |/ / M A T H I A S K E T T N E R
Preysingstr. 74 | |\/| | ' /
81667 München | | | | . \ Linux Beratung & Schulung
089 / 18 90 42 10 |_| |_|_|\_\ [http://mathias-kettner.de](http://mathias-kettner.de)
_______________________________________________
checkmk-en mailing list
checkmk-en@lists.mathias-kettner.de